Understanding the Legal Aspects of Sexual Communication with a Child
What is Sexual Communication with a Child?
Sexual communication with a child is often described as online grooming because, more often than not, conversations caught under the criminal law take place in online chat forums. However, the offence also catches other forms of communication, including for example, email, text messages, WhatsApp messages, Facebook messages and oral communications.
Sexual communication with a child is an offence contrary to Section 15A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. In order to be found guilty of the offence, the prosecution must prove that:
– A person aged 18 or over (“the adult”);
– intentionally communicates with a person aged under 16 (“the child”);
– for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification.
Additionally, it must also be proved that:
– the communication is sexual or is intended to encourage the child to make a communication that is sexual; and,
– the adult does not reasonably believe that the child is aged 16 or over.
What does sexual gratification mean?
It is an essential element of the offence that the adult is engaging in the communication for immediate or future sexual gratification. This means that the adult is taking pleasure or satisfaction from the sexual nature of the conversation at the time of the conversation, or intending to do so at some point.
What does sexual communication mean?
Simply having a conversation with a child online is not in itself an offence. It is the sexual nature and/ or content of the conversation that makes it illegal.
A communication is sexual if any part of it relates to sexual activity, or if a reasonable person would in all the circumstances consider the communication to be sexual.
Usually, it will be immediately apparent whether or not a communication is sexual, or whether the adult is trying to encourage the child to say something sexual. As most cases of sexual communication with a child involve written communication, a record of the chat is usually able to be retrieved which therefore provides conclusive evidence as to the nature and content of the conversation.
Reasonable belief
Whether a belief is reasonable will be determined by considering all the circumstances of the case. This could include any steps the adult had taken to ascertain the age of the child, or something the child had told the adult about themselves or their development which is indicative of age (e.g. that they had a good day at school) or the child’s appearance if a photo of them appeared on the chat forum.
Paedophile hunters / vigilante groups
It is increasingly common for members of the public to form groups and use online chat forums to pose as children and engage adults in sexual conservations. They do so in order to expose or ‘catch’ paedophiles and report them to the police.
In these circumstances, the elements of the offence of sexual communication with a child may not made out if the person the adult is communicating with is not in fact under 16. Rather, they are likely to be an adult pretending to be a child. Therefore, the alternative offence of ‘attempting’ to engage in sexual communication with a child would likely be charged.
What is the sentence for sexual communication with a child?
There are usually a number of factors which the court will need to balance in order to arrive at the appropriate sentence. The sentencing guidelines for this offence can be found here: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/sexual-communication-with-a-child/
The court will first determine the ‘harm’ caused as a result of the offending. This involves a decision as to whether the offence falls within category 1 or 2. A category 1 offence involves conversations where sexual images or digital media have been exchanged, or where significant psychological harm or distress was caused or intended to be caused to the victim. Category 2 cases are less serious in that they include cases where category 1 factors are not present.
Next, the court considers the offender’s ‘culpability’ or blameworthiness. Culpability A factors include the use of threats, bribes or gifts, group offending and commercial exploitation or motivation. Culpability B cases are less serious in that they include cases where culpability A factors are not present.
Once the categories of Harm and Culpability have been decided, it is possible to identify the starting point for sentence. This could range from a community order (engaging with the probation service) for the less serious offences, up to 2 years imprisonment for the more serious offences, or repeat offenders.
Will I be put on the sex offender’s register for sexual communication with a child?
If you are convicted of engaging in sexual communication with a child, you will automatically be made subject to the notification requirements of the sex offender’s register.
How can we help?
Our team of criminal defence solicitors specialise in sexual offences. Contact us for a confidential, discreet discussion about your circumstances as obtaining legal advice early on from specialist sexual offence solicitors can make a significant difference to the outcome of your case.
4 responses to “Understanding the Legal Aspects of Sexual Communication with a Child”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply


Hi, I’ve would like to understand or know that if a woman has stated that she is 19, but is 15 and yet still goes ahead and reports to the police that an adult has engaged in sexual communication with them, the adult does now know they are under 16 and they do not look it either. The chat is of sexual nature of them asking for weed and alcohol and if this is bought for them they will engage in sexual activity (the underage human has initiated it). This interaction via text/call has happened on one day. no further contact has been made either. My question is, the underage accuser has blatantly lied to the adult about their age and there is proof – so why are the police still arresting and questioning the adult when nothing further has happened – and not asking why they have lied about their age (with their mother sat next to them)
In order for a person to be convicted of an offence of Engaging in Sexual Communication with a Child contrary to Section 15A Sexual Offences Act 2003, the prosecution must prove the following:
(a) That you were aged over 18,
(b) for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, you intentionally communicated with
another person,
(c) the communication was sexual or was intended to encourage the other person to
make a communication that was sexual, and
(d) the other person was under 16 and you did not reasonably believe that they were aged
16 or over.
Therefore, if your belief was that the person you were conversing with was over the age of 16 and that belief was reasonable in all the circumstances, you may have a defence to the allegation. In order to receive specific advice, tailored to the individual circumstances of a particular situation, please contact our new enquiries team to arrange to speak to a solicitor. We can be contacted on 0207 8464 999/ [email protected], or via the website.
I am seeking legal advice regarding the following matters arising from alleged offences in the United Kingdom:
Adult attempting sexual communication with a child under 16 years of age
Adult attempting to cause a child under 16 years of age to watch a sexual act
The alleged conduct occurred online with an undercover police officer. After the police interview, the individual was permitted to return to their home country while on police bail, with the police’s knowledge. The individual’s lawyer subsequently confirmed by email that the bail had been extended administratively. However, it now appears the police claim that the bail was missed.
While overseas, charges were issued, and the case proceeded to court in the UK. The lawyer received the charge details and court date but did not notify the individual, resulting in a missed court appearance and a bench warrant now being in effect. The individual’s home country does not have an extradition treaty with the UK.
I would like to request advice regarding the following points:
Sentencing guidance — potential outcomes under both a guilty plea and a not-guilty plea scenario for these offences.
Extradition and Interpol matters — the likelihood of:
the UK requesting a Red Notice, diffusion, or other Interpol alert;
the individual’s information being circulated via Interpol; and
the UK pursuing extradition from a country without an extradition treaty for these specific charges.
Consultation logistics — whether this consultation can take place online, the estimated fees for reviewing and advising on all these issues, and confirmation that the consultation and any information shared are treated as fully confidential and not disclosed to UK authorities or any third party.
Many thanks for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.
Thank you for your enquiry. We would be more than happy to offer a confidential video consultation during which we can advise in relation to the law relating to the alleged offence(s), sentence (in general terms; specific advice can only be offered if we are in possession of the case papers) and plea (assuming that we have access to the case papers). We cannot assist in relation to advice concerning extradition as we do not specialise in that area, however we could engage specialist counsel if required. If you wish to make an appointment, please contact our New Enquiry Team on 0207 8464 999 or email [email protected]